{"id":208564,"date":"2015-06-01T06:45:13","date_gmt":"2015-06-01T05:45:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.mibiz.dev\/?p=208564"},"modified":"2021-07-06T06:47:47","modified_gmt":"2021-07-06T05:47:47","slug":"novedades-arbitrales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/","title":{"rendered":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Sentencia 4\/2015 de 13 de enero de 2015, de la Sala de lo Civil y lo Penal del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se estima la demanda de designaci\u00f3n de \u00e1rbitro con base en un convenio arbitral que establec\u00eda la posibilidad de que se resolviera la controversia por un tribunal arbitral compuestos por dos \u00e1rbitros y se designaba como entidad nominadora a la CCI. El Tribunal Superior de Justicia (TSJ) de Madrid entiende que, pese a la nulidad radical de parte del convenio, existe una clara voluntad de someterse a arbitraje, por lo que esa nulidad no invalida todo el convenio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">El TSJ resuelve que, pese a que la designaci\u00f3n de un n\u00famero de par de \u00e1rbitros resulta radicalmente nula en s\u00ed misma, \u00e9sta no vicia la voluntad de las partes de someterse a arbitraje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Por tanto, salvando esa voluntad de someterse a arbitraje, se ha de actuar como si la parte de la cl\u00e1usula relativa al n\u00famero de \u00e1rbitros no existiese y al no haberse dispuesto el n\u00famero de \u00e1rbitros, en aplicaci\u00f3n del art\u00edculo 12 de la Ley de Arbitraje, debe nombrarse un \u00e1rbitro \u00fanico, tal y como ped\u00eda la demandante.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A juicio del TSJ, a lo anterior no cabe objetar la aplicaci\u00f3n del principio de kompetenz kompetenz dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 22.1 de la Ley de Arbitraje puesto que \u201c<em>existe una regla de aplicaci\u00f3n supletoria que justifica la formalizaci\u00f3n judicial [que ratifica la exposici\u00f3n de motivos de la Ley de Arbitraje que aclara] que las facultades que se atribuyen a los \u00e1rbitros para decidir sobre su propia competencia o sobre cuestiones que puedan obstar a un pronunciamiento de fondo (no comprenden) las relativas a las personas de los \u00e1rbitros, que tienen su tratamiento propio\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Por tanto, el TSJ pide al Secretario General de la Corte de Arbitraje de la C\u00e1mara de Comercio Internacional (CCI) \u2013designado como autoridad nominadora en el convenio arbitral- que, previa audiencia a las partes, remita al Alto Tribunal una terna de \u00e1rbitros para su posterior nombramiento entre ellos por sorteo en presencia de las partes, de conformidad con el art\u00edculo 15.5 de la Ley de Arbitraje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sentencia disponible en:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.poderjudicial.es\/search\/doAction?action=contentpdf&amp;databasematch=AN&amp;reference=7286975&amp;links=arbitraje&amp;optimize=20150212&amp;publicinterface=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">http:\/\/www.poderjudicial.es\/search\/doAction?action=contentpdf&amp;databasematch=AN&amp;reference=7286975&amp;links=arbitraje&amp;optimize=20150212&amp;publicinterface=true<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentencia 4\/2015 de 13 de enero de 2015, de la Sala de lo Civil y lo Penal del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid Se estima la demanda de designaci\u00f3n de \u00e1rbitro con base en un convenio arbitral que establec\u00eda la posibilidad de que se resolviera la controversia por un tribunal arbitral compuestos por dos [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":208566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"off","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sin-categorizar"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sentencia 4\/2015 de 13 de enero de 2015, de la Sala de lo Civil y lo Penal del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid Se estima la demanda de designaci\u00f3n de \u00e1rbitro con base en un convenio arbitral que establec\u00eda la posibilidad de que se resolviera la controversia por un tribunal arbitral compuestos por dos [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-01T05:45:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-06T05:47:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"394\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\",\"name\":\"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-01T05:45:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-06T05:47:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7fbcbf14deddbbd50f36f8f7af902987\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":394},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid\",\"description\":\"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid creada por la C\u00e1mara de Comercio de Madrid\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7fbcbf14deddbbd50f36f8f7af902987\",\"name\":\"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/author\/monica-acmibizpartners-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","og_description":"Sentencia 4\/2015 de 13 de enero de 2015, de la Sala de lo Civil y lo Penal del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid Se estima la demanda de designaci\u00f3n de \u00e1rbitro con base en un convenio arbitral que establec\u00eda la posibilidad de que se resolviera la controversia por un tribunal arbitral compuestos por dos [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/","og_site_name":"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","article_published_time":"2015-06-01T05:45:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-06T05:47:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":394,"url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/","url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/","name":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg","datePublished":"2015-06-01T05:45:13+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-06T05:47:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7fbcbf14deddbbd50f36f8f7af902987"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg","width":1000,"height":394},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/","name":"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","description":"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid creada por la C\u00e1mara de Comercio de Madrid","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/7fbcbf14deddbbd50f36f8f7af902987","name":"monica.ac@mibizpartners.com","url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/author\/monica-acmibizpartners-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208564"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":208567,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208564\/revisions\/208567"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/208566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}