{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","provider_url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/","title":"NOVEDADES ARBITRALES - Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KNGhFaMWMu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/\">NOVEDADES ARBITRALES<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/en\/sin-categorizar\/novedades-arbitrales\/embed\/#?secret=KNGhFaMWMu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;NOVEDADES ARBITRALES&#8221; &#8212; Corte de Arbitraje de Madrid\" data-secret=\"KNGhFaMWMu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/arbitramadrid.factorideas.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Jurisprudencia.jpg","thumbnail_width":1000,"thumbnail_height":394,"description":"Sentencia 4\/2015 de 13 de enero de 2015, de la Sala de lo Civil y lo Penal del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid Se estima la demanda de designaci\u00f3n de \u00e1rbitro con base en un convenio arbitral que establec\u00eda la posibilidad de que se resolviera la controversia por un tribunal arbitral compuestos por dos [&hellip;]"}